Publication:
Triple-Negative PAM50 Non-Basal Breast Cancer Subtype Predicts Benefit from Extended Adjuvant Capecitabine

dc.contributor.authorAsleh, K
dc.contributor.authorLluch, A
dc.contributor.authorGoytain, A
dc.contributor.authorBarrios, C
dc.contributor.authorWang, XQ
dc.contributor.authorTorrecillas, L
dc.contributor.authorGao, D
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Borrego, M
dc.contributor.authorLeung, S
dc.contributor.authorBines, J
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero-Zotano, A
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Saenz, JA
dc.contributor.authorCejalvo, JM
dc.contributor.authorHerranz, J
dc.contributor.authorTorres, R
dc.contributor.authorde-la-Haba-Rodriguez, J
dc.contributor.authorAyala, F
dc.contributor.authorGomez, H
dc.contributor.authorRojo, F
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, TO
dc.contributor.authorMartin, M
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-27T17:33:48Z
dc.date.available2024-11-27T17:33:48Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Predictive biomarkers for capecitabine benefit in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have been recently proposed using samples from phase III clinical trials, including non-basal phenotype and biomarkers related to angiogenesis, stroma, and capecitabine activation genes. We aimed to validate these findings on the larger phase III GEICAM/CIBOMA clinical trial. Experimental Design: Tumor tissues from patients with TNBC randomized to standard (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy followed by capecitabine versus observation were analyzed using a 164-gene NanoString custom nCounter codeset measuring mRNA expression. A prespecified statistical plan sought to verify the predictive capacity of PAM50 non-basal molecular subtype and tested the hypotheses that breast tumors with increased expression of (meta) genes for cytotoxic cells, mast cells, endothelial cells, PDL2, and 38 individual genes benefit from adjuvant capecitabine for distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS; primary endpoint) and overall survival. Results: Of the 876 women enrolled in the GEICAM/CIBOMA trial, 658 (75%) were evaluable for analysis (337 with capecitabine and 321 without). Of these cases, 553 (84%) were profiled as PAM50 basal-like whereas 105 (16%) were PAM50 non-basal. Non-basal subtype was the most significant predictor for capecitabine benefit [HRcapecitabine, 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07–0.54; P < 0.001] when compared with PAM50 basal-like (HRcapecitabine, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.63–1.28; P = 0.55; Pinteraction<0.001, adjusted P value = 0.01). Analysis of biological processes related to PAM50 non-basal subtype revealed its enrichment for mast cells, extracellular matrix, angiogenesis, and features of mesenchymal stem-like TNBC subtype. Conclusions: In this prespecified correlative analysis of the GEICAM/CIBOMA trial, PAM50 non-basal status identified patients with early-stage TNBC most likely to benefit from capecitabine.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps: //doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2191
dc.identifier.journalClinical Cancer Research
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14703/255
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Association for Cancer Research Inc.
dc.publisher.countryUS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAdjuvants, Immunologic
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectCapecitabine
dc.subjectChemotherapy, Adjuvant
dc.subjectEndothelial Cells
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectTriple Negative Breast Neoplasms
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21
dc.titleTriple-Negative PAM50 Non-Basal Breast Cancer Subtype Predicts Benefit from Extended Adjuvant Capecitabine
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
389.pdf
Size:
721.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format