Publication:
Exploring treatment decision-making at diagnosis for children with advanced cancer in low- and middle-income countries

dc.contributor.authorSalek, M
dc.contributor.authorPorter, AS
dc.contributor.authorMaradiege, E
dc.contributor.authorDolendo, MCJ
dc.contributor.authorFigueredo, D
dc.contributor.authorGeriga, F
dc.contributor.authorGunasekera, S
dc.contributor.authorKizyma, R
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, HTK
dc.contributor.authorNzamu, I
dc.contributor.authorRaza, MR
dc.contributor.authorRustamova, K
dc.contributor.authorSari, NM
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Galindo, C
dc.contributor.authorGraetz, D
dc.contributor.authorBhakta, N
dc.contributor.authorKaye, EC
dc.contributor.authorWise, PH
dc.contributor.authorHunleth, JM
dc.contributor.authorFriedrich, P
dc.contributor.authorForce, L
dc.contributor.authorBaker, JN
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-05T17:29:28Z
dc.date.available2025-02-05T17:29:28Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Global childhood cancer survival outcomes correlate with regional contextual factors, yet upfront treatment decision-making for children with advanced or poor prognosis cancer in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is not well understood. This study aimed to (1) characterize the landscape of contextual factors that shape physician decision-making at diagnosis for these children in LMICs and (2) describe physician rationales for if/when to offer treatment with non-curative intent, including how they define “poor prognosis” during treatment decision-making. Methods: An international panel of pediatric oncologists practicing in LMICs participated in two focus groups structured for the collaborative generation of factors influencing treatment decision-making, including consideration of non-curative treatment pathways at diagnosis. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was conducted, followed by member checking. Results: Eleven pediatric oncologists participated, representing all global regions defined by the World Health Organization. Participants identified a broad range of factors influencing decision-making across multiple levels, including the individual, hospital, health system, community, and country levels. All participants agreed that treatment with non-curative intent could be offered at diagnosis in certain contexts, and diverse definitions for poor prognosis were described. Conclusions: Upfront treatment decision-making for children with advanced or poor prognosis cancer in LMICs is variable and challenging. Difficulties with decision-making in LMICs may be amplified by inconsistent definitions of poor prognosis and underrepresentation of the factors that influence treatment decision-making within existing decision-making frameworks or childhood cancer treatment guidelines. Future research should explore decision-making approaches, preferences, and challenges in depth from the perspectives of pediatric cancer patients, families, and multidisciplinary clinicians. © The Author(s) 2024.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00520-024-08951-z
dc.identifier.journalSupportive Care in Cancer
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14703/359
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.publisher.countryUS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectDecision-making
dc.subjectGlobal health
dc.subjectLow- and middle-income countries
dc.subjectPediatric cancer
dc.subjectPoor prognosis
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.21
dc.titleExploring treatment decision-making at diagnosis for children with advanced cancer in low- and middle-income countries
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files