Browsing by Author "Flores, R"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Publication Prognostic factors for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis from breast cancer(Future Medicine Ltd., 2015) Castaneda, Carlos; Flores, R; Castillo, Miluska; Rojas, KY; Castillo, M; Dolores-Cerna, K; Flores, C; Belmar-Lopez, C; Milla, E; Gomez, HLAim: This retrospective study determined features associated with brain metastasis (BM) in women with breast cancer. Patients & methods: A total of 215 initially early breast cancer cases were included. We reviewed files and CT scan images of BM. Results: Median age was 47 years and most of our cases were stage III (58.6%), grade III (62.8%), ER negative (62.3%) and nonluminal (59.1%). Median survival after BM was 4 months. Nonluminal, extracranial disease, time to CNS shorter than 15 months, >three brain lesions and poor breast-graded prognostic assessment and recursive partitioning analysis scores were associated with shorter survival. Adding extracranial disease to breast-graded prognostic assessment score also predicted survival after BM. Radiation response was assessed in 57 patients and response tended to be associated with nonluminal phenotype but not with survival. Conclusion: Factors associated with both initial tumor and clinical features at BM time are associated with shorter survival in our Latinas population.Publication Temozolomide and capecitabine regimen as first-line treatment in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at a Latin American reference center(Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 2024) Cruz-Diaz, WE; Paitan, V; Medina, J; Flores, R; Haro-Varas, J; Mantilla, R; Castro-Oliden, VBACKGROUND Numerous studies have indicated that the temozolomide and capecitabine regimen (TEMCAP) exhibits a certain level of efficacy in treating advanced, well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). However, published data from Peru are limited. We hypothesize that this regimen could be a viable therapeutic option for advanced GEP-NET in the Peruvian population. AIM To evaluate overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with advanced GEP-NET treated with TEMCAP at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN) in Lima-Perú. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients with GEP-NEN treated with the TEMCAP regimen between 2011 and 2021 at the INEN. A total of thirty-eight patients were included in the final analysis: Thirty-five received TEMCAP as a first-line treatment, and three as a second-line treatment. The primary objective was to evaluate OS. The efficacy and safety of TEMCAP were assessed until the occurrence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 52 years (range 24–77 years), and 53.3% were female. The most common symptoms at diagnosis were abdominal pain in 31 patients (81.6%). Primary tumors included 12 in the rectum (31.6%), 11 in the pancreas (28.9%), 3 in the ileum (7.9%), 2 in the mesentery (5.3%), 2 in the small intestine (5.3%), 1 in the appendix (2.6%), 1 in the stomach (2.6%) and 6 cases of liver metastasis of unknown primary (15.8%). Five were neuroendocrine tumors (NET) G1 (13.2%), 33 were NET G2 (86.8%), five had Ki67 < 3% (13.2%), and 33 had Ki67 between 3% and 20% (86.8%). TEMCAP was administered to 35 (92.1%) patients as first-line treatment. OS at 12, 36, and 60 months was estimated in 80%, 66%, and 42%, respectively, with a median OS of 49 months. CONCLUSION TEMCAP therapy is a viable first-line option regarding efficacy and tolerability in areas where standard therapy is inaccessible. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.