Browsing by Author "Enriquez, D"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts early mortality in females with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
(Public Library of Science, 2020) de la Cruz-Ku, G; Chambergo-Michilot, D; Torres-Roman, JS; Rebaza, P; Pinto, J; Araujo, J; Morante, Z; Enriquez, D; Flores, C; Luque, R; Saavedra, A; Lujan, M; Gomez, H; Valcarcel, B
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the utility of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a biomarker for predicting early-mortality (<2 years) among females with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Methods: We reviewed 118 medical records of females with mTNBC. The cut-off value for the NLR (<2.5 and ≥2.5) was determined with receiver operating characteristic curves (area under the curve: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62-0.85). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify the risk of mortality at two years. Moreover, we performed sensitivity analyses with different cut-off values and a subgroup analysis in females that only received chemotherapy. Results: The median follow-up was 24 months. Females with NLR ≥2.5 had a poor overall survival compared to females with NLR <2.5 (6% vs. 28%, p<0.001) at two years. This outcome remained when we stratified for females that only received chemotherapy (8% vs. 36%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified NLR ≥2.5 as a poor prognostic risk factor for mortality in the entire population (HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.32-3.39) and among females that received chemotherapy (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.46-4.92). Conclusion: The NLR is an accessible and reliable biomarker that predicts early mortality among females with mTNBC. Our results suggest that females with high NLR values have poor prognosis despite receiving standard chemotherapy. Health providers should evaluate the possibility to enroll these patients in novel immunotherapy trials.
Temporal Variation of Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Real-World Experience From 2000 to 2014
(Elsevier Inc., 2023) Valcarcel, B; Torres-Roman, JS; Enriquez, D; Vidaurre, T; De-la-Cruz-Ku, G
Background: Previous studies have reported a higher prevalence of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in US Hispanic/Latina populations. However, survival outcomes and treatment approaches over time in Latin American females are scarcely reported. We aimed to evaluate the temporal variation in treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) outcomes of females with TNBC according to cancer stage. Materials and Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study on 1840 females from 2000 to 2014. Patients were classified in 3 calendar periods (2000-2004, 2005-2009, and 2010-2014). The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable regression analyses were employed. Results: Stage III cancer was identified in half of the population. Five-year OS estimates for cancer stages I, II, and IV remained unchanged across all calendar periods. However, we found worsening 5-year OS estimates in stage III females (49% in 2000-2004 and 31% in 2010-2014; P < .001). Despite increased uptake of overall use of neoadjuvant therapy in stage III females, the time from diagnosis to treatment initiation (P = .013) and time to complete the planned cycles (P < .001) increased over time. Fifty-sex percent of stage IV patients were untreated. Females aged ≥70 years were less likely to receive treatment. Conclusions: Survival estimates were lower than those reported in high-income countries. Most females were diagnosed with advanced disease, and the OS for stage III females worsened over time. Our outcomes show difficulties in delivering timely neoadjuvant therapy in an overwhelmed healthcare system. Public health authorities should improve screening practices, develop regional clinical guidelines, and expand trial enrollment.