Browsing by Author "Cazap, E"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Publication Choosing Wisely in oncology in Latin America: what SLACOM does not recommend in the care of cancer patients in Latin America(ecancer Global Foundation, 2024) Ismael, J; Esandi, E; Arroyo, G; Becerra, S; Bejarano, S; Castro, C; Enrique, C; Gauna, C; Gutiérrez-Delgado, F; Deza, EG; Kopitowsky, K; Lewi, D; Muller, B; Murillo, R; Pomata, A; Puyol, J; Quintanilla, G; Rompato, S; Santini, L; Vidaurre, T; Solano, A; Cazap, EChoosing Wisely is an initiative by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) and ABIM Foundation to deter unnecessary medical treatments and procedures. Faced with the burden of modern technologies and treatments, it is crucial to identify practices lacking value in daily care. The Latin American and Caribbean Society (SLACOM), comprising cancer control experts, deems it vital to tailor this initiative for enhancing cancer care in the region. Through a modified DELPHI methodology involving two rounds of electronic questionnaires and a hybrid meeting to discuss key points of contention, ten essential recommendations were identified and prioritised to avoid harmful oncology procedures in our region. These consensus-based recommendations, contextualised for Latin America, have been compiled and shared to benefit patients. The Scientific Committee, consisting of prominent oncologists and health experts, collaborates remotely to drive this project forward.Publication Community-Led Action Research in Oncology: Pandemic-Appropriate Radiotherapy Innovations Evaluated (CLARO PARTE) for Latin America and the Caribbean Countries(Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2024) Riano, I; Alas-Pineda, C; Reyes, Garcia, S; Murillo, R; Gutiérrez-Delgado, F; Cazap, E; Pais, Viegas, CM; Torre, MDL; Barahona, KC; Sarria, GJ; Del, Castillo, Bahi, R; Luongo-Céspedes, Á; Ovalles, B; Umaña, Herrera, FV; Sánchez, R; Mcvorran, S; Williams, B; Kascmar, J; Kennedy, LS; Lyons, KD; Bejarano, S; Wong, SLPURPOSE This study aimed to identify, evaluate, and rank suitable safety innovations developed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) radiation oncology centers.METHODSWe conducted a multimodal participatory engagement collaboration with the Latin-American and Caribbean Society of Medical Oncology. The study consisted of four phases. Innovations were collected from a panel of radiotherapy experts representing a diverse group of 11 countries from LAC (Phase I). Next, a medical scientific team compared the innovations against international standards regarding their potential impact on risk of infection, clinical operation, and continuity of quality cancer care (Phase II). Their findings were supplied to the country representatives who rated the innovations for acceptability in their cancer centers (Phase III), resulting in a final report of the panel's recommendations (Phase IV). RESULTS A total of 81 innovations were reported by the country representatives and merged by the medical scientific team into 24 innovations that combined similar innovations. The 24 innovations were grouped into six categories including practices aimed at (1) reducing clinic crowding (n = 3), (2) increasing screening and vaccinations for COVID-19 disease (n = 5), (3) implementing social distancing (n = 6), (4) strengthening personal infection equipment and disinfection (n = 6), (5) avoiding delaying or shortening treatment protocols (n = 2), and (6) mixed procedures (n = 2). The medical scientific team found nearly all innovations were supported by international recommendations and rated as safe, efficient, and acceptable. CONCLUSION By using the lessons learned from the Community-Led Action Research in Oncology: Pandemic-Appropriate Radiotherapy Innovations Evaluated study, a manual of scalable practices in radiation oncology clinics may be developed to guide actions during future large-scale public health crises in low- and middle-income countries of LAC.