Browsing by Author "Bustamante, E"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Brain Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
(John Wiley and Sons Inc, 2024) Bustamante, E; Casas, F; Luque, R; Piedra, L; Barros-Sevillano, S; Chambergo-Michilot, D; Torres-Roman, JS; Narvaez-Rojas, A; Morante, Z; Enriquez-Vera, D; Desai, A; Razuri, C; De, La, Cruz-Ku, G; Araujo, J
Background. Breast cancer is an important cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide and represents the second most frequent cause of brain metastases after lung cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with brain metastasis (BM). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients diagnosed with TNBC at the "Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas"(period 2000-2014) to evaluate patients who developed BM. Survival rates were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were identified with the Cox regression analysis. Results. Of a total of 2007 TNBC patients, 193 (9.62%) developed BM. Of these, 169 stages I-III patients with a median age of 45 years (range:21-78) were included. The stage in this cohort was 4 (2.4%) clinical stage (CS) I, 23 (13.6%) with CS II and 142 (84.0%) with CS III. Most of these patients presented ECOG ≥2 (68.6%). The most common symptom was headache (74.0%), followed by nausea-vomiting (46.7%). Imaging showed that 80 patients (53.0%) had ≥1 metastatic brain lesion. Regarding the treatment of BM in this cohort, 132 patients (84.6%) received radiotherapy (RT), 2 (1.5%) surgery, and 6 (4.5%) surgery plus RT. The overall survival (OS) rate of BM was 59.8%, 37.3%, and 15.0% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed RT to be the only factor with a positive impact on the OS of BM (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.30-0.77, and p=0.002), while ECOG ≥2 was associated with a worse OS (HR = 1.69, 95%CI:1.15-2.48, and p=0.007). Conclusion. Despite the poor prognosis of TNBC patients who develop BM, RT showed a benefit in OS rates, while ECOG ≥2 was the only prognostic factor associated with a worse OS. These results may be useful for multidisciplinary teams for treatment planning in patients with TNBC and BM.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Oncology Clinical Research in Latin America (LACOG 0420)
(American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021) Lara Gongora, AB; Werutsky, G; Jardim, DL; Nogueira-Rodrigues, A; Barrios, CH; Mathias, C; Maluf, F; Riechelmann, R; Fraga, M; Gomes, H; William, WN; Yamada, CAF; de Castro, G Jr; Rosa, DD; de Melo, AC; Sala, R; Bustamante, E; Bretel, D; Arrieta, O; Cardona, AF; Bastos, DA
Purpose: COVID-19 has affected cancer care worldwide. Clinical trials are an important alternative for the treatment of oncologic patients, especially in Latin America, where trials can be the only opportunity for some of them to access novel and, sometimes, standard treatments.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study, in which a 22-question survey regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncology clinical trials was sent to 350 representatives of research programs in selected Latin American institutions, members of the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group.Results: There were 90 research centers participating in the survey, with 70 of them from Brazil. The majority were partly private or fully private (n = 77; 85.6%) and had confirmed COVID-19 cases at the institution (n = 57; 63.3%). Accruals were suspended at least for some studies in 80% (n = 72) of the responses, mostly because of sponsors' decision. Clinical trials' routine was affected by medical visits cancelation, reduction of patients' attendance, reduction of other specialties' availability, and/or alterations on follow-up processes. Formal COVID-19 mitigation policies were adopted in 96.7% of the centers, including remote monitoring and remote site initiation visits, telemedicine visits, reduction of research team workdays or home office, special consent procedures, shipment of oral drugs directly to patients' home, and increase in outpatient diagnostic studies. Importantly, some of these changes were suggested to be part of future oncology clinical trials' routine, particularly the ones regarding remote methods, such as telemedicine. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this was the first survey to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on Latin American oncology clinical trials. The results are consistent with surveys from other world regions. These findings may endorse improvements in clinical trials' processes and management in the postpandemic period.
Survival according to the site of metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer patients: The Peruvian experience
(Public Library of Science, 2024) Piedra-Delgado, L; Chambergo-Michilot, D; Morante, Z; Fairen, C; Jerves-Coello, F; Luque-Benavides, R; Casas, F; Bustamante, E; Razuri-Bustamante, C; Torres-Roman, JS; Fuentes, H; Gomez, H; Narvaez-Rojas, A; De, La, Cruz-Ku, G; Araujo, J
Background Evidence regarding differences in survival associated with the site of metastasis in triplenegative breast cancer (TNBC) remains limited. Our aim was to analyze the overall survival (OS), distant relapse free survival (DRFS), and survival since the diagnosis of the relapse (MS), according to the side of metastasis. Methods This was a retrospective study of TNBC patients with distant metastases at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (Lima, Peru) from 2000 to 2014. Prognostic factors were determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results In total, 309 patients were included. Regarding the type of metastasis, visceral metastasis accounted for 41% and the lung was the most frequent first site of metastasis (33.3%). With a median follow-up of 10.2 years, the 5-year DRFS and OS were 10% and 26%, respectively. N staging (N2-N3 vs. N0, HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.14), metastasis in visceral sites (vs. bone; HR = 1.55, 95%CI: 0.94-2.56), the central nervous system (vs. bone; HR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.10-3.22), and multiple sites (vs. bone; HR = 2.55, 95%CI:1.53-4.25) were prognostic factors of OS whereas multiple metastasis (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.42-3.72) was a predictor of MS. In terms of DRFS, there were no differences according to metastasis type or solid organ. Conclusion TNBC patients with multiple metastasis and CNS metastasis have an increased risk of death compared to those with bone metastasis in terms of OS and MS.